
VERBATIM NOTES
FRIENDS OF THORNBOROUGH
OPEN MEETING, 4 MARCH 2004,
Featuring Presentations by Three
Stakeholders
BOB NICHOLSON, ESTATES MANAGER, TARMAC NORTHERN
Company policy has been consistent since its public
presentation in November, 2002. The Nosterfield Quarry supplies about 25% of
North Yorkshire’s demand for sand and gravel. It employs 15 people directly,
plus 25 private hauliers, and contributes £85,000 pa in business rates. The
Aggregates Levy contribution to the Treasury by buyers at £1.60 per ton
is £880,000 [ie. 550,000 tons output pa].
Quarrying is undertaken in distinct phases. Topsoil removal
is observed by an archaeologist who inspects, records and removes any finds. A
JCB then quarries the aggregates and a dumper truck conveys them to the works.
When the water table is reached, a dredger takes over, the excess water is
pumped away, and the aggregates transported to the washing and sorting plant.
Trucks deliver the product to the mainly local markets via the A1 to
avoid villages. ["The quarry serves mainly markets in the south of the
county and adjacent areas of West Yorkshire." S6.17 of Minerals Officer’s
report, 19/7/94]
The approved restoration plan includes amenity lakes, hard
landscaping, footpaths and reconstituted agricultural land for grazing by
returning topsoil reserved in a bund. The Restoration Advisory Committee, like
the Local Liaison group, involves local representatives and stakeholders. This
committee can revamp the restoration plan without lengthy reference to NYCC, as
when adding two hectares of reed beds.
Nosterfield reserves will last about 3 years at the current
rate of production. Due to the lengthy planning lead time, Tarmac will shortly
apply to extend quarrying on to Ladybridge Farm, using a field conveyor to
transport aggregates under the lane separating it from the existing quarry. The
limited distribution of high quality aggregates on these fluvio-glacial terraces
mean that, in this area, after Ladybridge, Tarmac could profitably move only on
to Thornborough Moor.
The Ladybridge application will include an Environmental
Impact Assessment covering geology, hydrology, landscape, archaeology, ecology,
noise, dust and traffic. A long-reach excavator is necessary only because the
deposits are thinner. A working site involves protection and conservation,
advance landscaping works, and progressive restoration. The restoration must
incorporate a good landscape fit, increased biodiversity and recreational
amenity, leaving Ladybridge as a lake of varying depths.
Tarmac recognises that the henges are nationally important
monuments and will not submit any application for the Moor until it knows the
findings of the Conservation Management Strategy prepared by consultants and
overseen by the stakeholders.
MIKE GRIFFITHS, TARMAC’S ARCHAEOLOGIST
He was North Yorkshire’s County Archaeologist from 1975 to
1990, when he set up in private practice. In 1991, Tilcon employed him to report
on the area to the north of the B6267, which was occupied by reed beds and open
water as late as the Iron Age. Trial trenches produced very little indeed and
NYCC granted consent for quarrying subject to a watching brief. The first area
quarried, in the south-east corner of Nosterfield Quarry, found shallow
Neolithic pits stuffed with pottery and flints, indicating occupation of an area
of dried-out peat. There were 30-40 archaeological features in an area of about
15 acres. Accordingly, the next area to be quarried was tested first with trial
pits, which found pit alignments not indicated by geophysics, to discover if
this would be an easier management technique. As that did not prove to be the
case, the inspection method reverted to topsoil stripping, with this then being
carried out in controlled managed strips more akin to that used in normal
excavatory archaeology.
Neolithic finds since that first year have been very sparse ~
mainly small and scattered pottery shards. These would probably not survive
after being brought up to the topsoil by ploughing, which has probably already
destroyed much more. By comparison, flint is nearly indestructible but, over 40
hectares, relatively little has been found. What has was in association with
other archaeological material. There were half a dozen human burials from the
Bronze Age, which survived well at depth but were destroyed at plough depth, one
horse burial, and two square barrows. With the techniques used, 90% of the finds
have not provided any archaeological evidence They are simply cut features,
making dating difficult because the remains are in such poor condition.
He could now suggest how the site developed. In the north
east of the central area, a large post-glacial lake probably survived into the
Mesolithic period, and Neolithic occupation was concentrated around its edges.
All relics elsewhere are later in date. He has examined Ladybridge farm by a
desk-top study which has identified minor linear features, by field-walking to
recover everything visible, and by a magnetometer and resistivity survey. He
will soon start digging test trenches. Flints are concentrated in the south-west
corner, showing that Neolithic occupation is running out away from there.
Although quarrying is totally destructive of archaeology, it
is yet one of the few economic activities that requires investigation. More has
been learned as a direct result of quarrying than from any other source. It is
ploughing that destroys archaeology without record ~ while quarrying reveals,
records and saves important finds.
He has worked on this site for 14 years. A major study will
be undertaken by English Heritage to decide what to do [with the remaining
setting of the henges]. If nothing is done, the archaeology will be destroyed by
ploughing within 20 years. Either everything must be protected, or the
destruction must be managed sensitively.
Comment: Tarmac is holding the sword of Damocles over the
surviving setting of the henges. It owns Ladybridge Farm and most of
Thornborough Moor and so can control the land management system used by its
tenant farmers. That it chooses not to forbid ploughing on its archaeology-rich
land proves that this company is prepared to pursue profits at the expense of
our national heritage.
DR KEITH EMERICK
INSPECTOR OF ANCIENT MONUMENTS FOR NORTH YORKSHIRE, ENGLISH HERITAGE
Dr Emerick (i) polices the statutory consent procedures
relating to scheduled ancient monuments, and (ii) supports the County
Archaeologist by giving overviews and advice on "the cultural
environment".
In September, 2003, Tarmac approached EH regarding its
potential Ladybridge application, obliging him to write a paper to solicit
instructions. It suggested a 3-stage conservation plan process to understand the
significance of the landscape. Following the Australian model, the plan has to
be endorsed by all stakeholders, who will be asked what they regard as
important about the landscape, rather than external specialists making the
decisions. Conservation and development are no longer mutually exclusive [which
implies compromise]. This is a way of judging and balancing stakeholders’
views.
EH will not agree to any further quarrying until recent
archaeological finds are excavated and the "setting" is defined [but
this objection may not prevent the county council giving consent]. He
displayed maps showing [a] heritage monuments and quarrying superimposed on
geology of North Yorkshire, and [b] the defined setting of Stonehenge. The
"Designation Review" now being considered may replace the present
system of designating individual monuments by some form of blanket coverage for
clusters of sites.
There are two threats to this landscape. Defra is prepared to
offer better incentives to landowners to take land out of the plough ~ but
farmers can’t be forced to participate. A conservation plan will ensure that
the future use of the landscape will not have a detrimental effect on the
archaeology.
Comment: Dr Emerick will shortly be meeting the Friends’
committee, who have questions concerning the potential effectiveness of this
promising initiative.
SIMON SMALES, HEAD OF PLANNING, NYCC
The consultation process for the Ladybridge application will
take at least a year. The new Thornborough Henges Consultation & Working
Group set up by NYCC meets in private every six weeks. It is designed as a forum
for the exchange of information between stakeholders in an effort to take the
arguments out of the public domain and improve the clarity and understanding of
different points of view. Minutes will be public, participants can submit
papers, and Tarmac is to be co-opted. The objective is to ensure the most
acceptable management scheme for the henges and the associated area, including
access and information provision.
Comment: The Friends are represented on the Consultation
& Working Group, but are concerned that no archaeological organisation is
involved and that the minutes of the meetings, the first of which took place in
January, have not yet reached the public domain.
|